Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Boston's Comic-Con a Big Disappointment

Mr. Comic Book Issue #6

Published: Thursday, April 15, 2010

Updated: Monday, April 19, 2010 16:04

The Flash

DC Comics

Update April 17: So I see that the main segment of this weeks column, concerning Boston Comic Con, has made some of you quite mad at me. Well I'm writing this extra segment to alleviate some of these issues.  

The final amount of people who attended Boston Comic Con was around 5000 over two days.  Good numbers, and I'm very glad that a lot came.  

There have also been other comic cons in Boston for the past four years. My apologies for not finding them, but I searced for reports of past conventions and couldn't find any information.

Just a reminder: this column is based on my OPINION. That means I'm going to write about MY views. When I attended Comic Con on Saturday, I got in right when they opened at 10 a.m. and left around 1 p.m.  I didn't see that many people, and I didn't have a counter on me to count every person I saw.  When I say a lot of people didn't attend, I'm talking about the attendance for the time period that I was there.  

Glad to clear everything up.  Thank you to Comic Book Resources for mentioning the article on yesterdays "Comics A.M./The comics Internet in two minutes."

 

Boston's Comic-Con a Big Disappointment

This past weekend, April 10 and 11, the Boston Comic Con came to the Westin Boston Waterfront hotel. Boston hasn't had a comic convention since the Wizard-Con back in '05, and after this past weekend, it doesn't look like another one will be coming to town anytime soon.

While Boston is one of the biggest cities in America, it has been skipped by the comic book industry year after year. For those of you who don't see the significance of this, the convention gives publishers the time and opportunity to release their big news. Writers and artists sign autographs, while local vendors get a chance to be recognized. It's a fun time for even the casual comic book fan. So what went wrong with Boston?

There were a few things that went right. The entrance price wasn't anywhere near what other conventions in San Diego and New York charge, which made a smaller one like Boston's work. There was plenty of free stuff to be had, and the unknown writers and artists got a chance to shine just as much as the big boys.

Back to the bad. The room was tiny, with over half the room dedicated to vendors. Yeah, it was only one room.

The coordinators didn't have many people taking tickets. This meant many spent longer in line then they did in the actual convention.

Plus, the event wasn't well advertised. I didn't even know about it until I randomly Googled Boston Comic-Con to see if there was one. While Jim Lee was their main attraction, he barely made an appearance, and he was the only panelist. Billy Tan, Skottie Young, and Joe Quinones were the big name artists, but couldn't they get anyone else? No offense to those guys, but to attract the nerds, they need really big names.

The one good thing about the smaller crowd was that the artists were easier to talk too. I got a few autographs while shooting the breeze with each of them. Also didn't help that no legitimate news was announced from the one panel.

And the venue was a pain to get to, as the closest T stop is on the Red Line at South Station, a two mile walk from the hotel.

It wasn't a complete failure, but it also wasn't a step in the right direction. Hopefully Boston won't have to wait three years until the next convention.

Movie Time

Yep, "Kick-Ass" comes out this week. Look for my review later in the week.

Marvel released a few new stills for "Iron Man 2." Nothing big that we haven't seen already in the trailer.

More photos have surfaced of exterior shots for "Green Lantern." Ryan Reynolds can be seen, but it's so far away it's hard to tell if he is the Green Lantern uniform or not. More and more photos of filming keep coming up, when was that security going to be tightened?

Some strange rumors have surfaced that there are some quarrels on the set of "Thor." The cast denies them all. Guess someone was bored and decided to make some stuff up.

Trade/Series For Newcomers

With the movie version coming this week, I'm recommending reading "Kick-Ass." It's a great satire of comic book stories. The violence is awesome, but the characters are what drive the story. Mark Miller, the writer and produce of the film version, really has a grasp on how kids act in high school. John Romita J.R., the artist and producer, draws some of his best work in a long time.

Highlights for 4/14

DC

  • Brightest Day #0. It's going to be hard to top "Blackest Night," but DC is going to try. The first issue of their next event brings back Geoff Johns as writer, while he exchanges writing duties with others as the event goes on.
  • The Flash #1. Geoff Johns and Francis Manapul bring Barry Allen back into the limelight with a new volume of "The Flash." Johns recently brought Allen back after he was resurrected during "Final Crisis" in "The Flash: Rebirth." Johns is the Bendis of DC, which means it's always a good choice to read what he writes.

Marvel

  • Daredevil #506. Andy Diggle has a great hold on Daredevil, which he has made evident in only six issues. There is some big event called Shadowland coming up for Daredevil this summer, so start reading this great series now so you know what is going on.
  • Iron Man Legacy #1. Just in time for the movie release, Fred Van Lente helms the second Iron Man ongoing. Van Lente has proved he is a great writer, with recent highlights being "Marvel Zombies 5 #1" and his work on "The Amazing Spider-Man." Hopefully this series is decent and not just a complement to the movie release.
  • Siege: Loki #1. With "Siege" #4 being pushed to May, Marvel is releasing five one-shots to fill the gap. Kieron Gillen can write Loki better than anyone, and we haven't seen Loki sense "Siege" #1. This time away gives Gillen a lot of room to work with.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Charlie Finley
Sun Apr 18 2010 10:46
I think the review about Boston Comic Con was just an opinion & doesn’t seem to be a knock against the show. He even says that he will go next year. I don’t feel he was saying the artists in attendance were not good enough but it seems obvious to anyone that the show would have attracted more people if some other artists were there and the venue was bigger. I feel time would be better spent in improving next years show rather than complaining about one critics “opinion”, someone who actually went to the show and took the time to write about it.
Kevin Finnigan
Fri Apr 16 2010 15:27
Sorry if I offended anyone, it's just my opinion guys. I looked into past conventions, and couldn't find anything, so my bad for not looking hard enough. Thank you for the corrections. They were big names, I do agree with you guys, I'm just saying lets get more. As one of the biggest cities in America, they could have done better. I did enjoy myself, and will be going next year. Sense apparently you guys helped organize it, why wasn't it advertised? Just a general question

I do realize that they had over crowding problems. But you have to agree that the room was tiny. No way about it.

(and thank you for posting, good to know people actually read this, haha)

Colin Solan
Fri Apr 16 2010 11:09
Ordinarily I don't reply to post like these, people are certainly free to sit in their glass houses and throw stones, but when the reputations of the long list of artists we hosted last weekend are implicitly disparaged by saying they're not big names, I have to take issue.

Cameron Stewart, Skottie Young, and JH Williams have all just been nominated for Eisner Awards.

Jim Starlin, Bill Sienkiewicz, and Steve Rude have been stars for decades and some of the most influential creators of their generation.

Mark Chiarello is a talented painter and the Art Director of DC Comics.

Mike Mignola is one of the most distinguished comic artists ever. Plus creating Hellboy was kind of a big deal. I couldn't make it to his panel or that of Goon creator Eric Powell, but I heard both were great.

And Sergio Aragones is nothing short of a living legend for his MAD cartoons alone.

So say what will you about Boston Comic Con and those of us running it (though saying nobody showed up is just a factual inaccuracy since we were well over capacity) but respect the artists who came to visit the New England comic book community.

I realize I’m reiterating what Matt King posted but it certainly needed to be said.

Oh and thanks for coming!! Hope to see you at our next convention on April 2-3, 2011!!

Matt King
Fri Apr 16 2010 10:22
dude, you are a complete idiot... try checking your facts before writing such drivel.

point one - "there hasn't been a show in Boston since '05"?? -- this show has been growing for the past couple years - TWICE A YEAR!

point two - "unknown writers and artists"?? -- no, nobody knows Jim Lee, Mike Mignola, Sergio Aragones, Bill Sienkiewicz, Jim Starlin, JH Williams, Steve Rude, Ben Templesmith, Eric Powell, etc., etc. WHAT?? these guys are stars, some even LEGENDS!

point three - "nobody showed up"?? huh?? they were shut down by the Boston Police Dept for OVERCROWDING -- filled to capacity son -- that's "nobody showed up"??

I'm sure the guys who put the show on are planning next year's already - with some "no name talent" -- hopefully they will be able to resurrect Jack Kirby, as it seems anything short of that would be a disappointment to you.

what a lousy write up for a great growing show and a fabulously entertaining weekend.

boo to you.

Kevin Finnigan
Thu Apr 15 2010 12:32
I completely agree with you. It's a young show, but there are also numerous examples for them to base it off of. Not sure if you have seen other cons, but the space compared to others was ridiculously small, which is why they couldn't let a lot of people in. A bigger area could have let a lot more people in. I talked to a bunch of comic book store owners and they even said they were very disappointed in the facilities.

It is a growing show, but with such a low turn out, it's going to be hard to justify having another. I hope they do. I would defiantly go again, even if it is in the same venue. But lets get some more big names. Even the people I talked to weren't that happy it was just Jim Lee who showed up

Suffolk_Voice,JTempos500@hotmail.com
Thu Apr 15 2010 11:03
I feel that the assessment of the Boston Comic Con is unfair and unrealistic. The Boston Comic Con is a young show, only having been around for about three years. It also throws a show twice a year, about every six months. In the last year, it has gone from a one day show to a two day show, due to a growth in attendance.

The space at the Westin was actually larger than the previous space at the Back Bay Events Center. The Boston Comic Con is a growing show and is not supposed to be comparable to the San Diego or New York cons.

I am not sure what you mean by no one attended. On Saturday there was a line to get in the entire day. At one point they could not let anyone else in ( and again this is a bigger space then the previous year).

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In